Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Stock Exchange Rising From Ashes Of Black Monday???


It seems that the Stock Market just might be able do it without the HANDS OF THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT. I still plea to all to start voting out as many of these people we can vote out. It seems they only have the will of the people in mind when it comes close to election time. We need strong people on the hill for the people all the time not just when elections come around. Maybe this whole BAILOUT thing will open the eyes to many people to what has been going on the past eight years with the fear tactic's being used against us to further line their pockets at our expense. I have an idea that just might work with that 700 billion dollars lets put it towards energy independence and design cars that can run cleaner and energy we can afford to heat our homes. What do think is it time to vote them out and demand money towards energy independence? We will make a recovery if we plan ahead to the future and stop all the greedy people in their tracts.

Monday, September 29, 2008

BLACK MONDAY

WASHINGTON -- In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House today defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leaving both parties' lawmakers and the Bush administration scrambling to pick up the pieces. Dismayed investors sent the Dow Jones industrials plunging nearly 800 points, the most ever for a single day. "We need to put something back together that works," a grim-faced Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said after he and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke joined in an emergency strategy session at the White House. On Capitol Hill, Democratic leaders said the House would reconvene Thursday, leaving open the possibility that it could salvage a reworked version. All sides agreed the effort to bolster beleaguered financial markets, potentially the biggest government intervention since the Great Depression, could not be abandoned.
But in a remarkable display this morning, a majority of House members slapped aside the best version their leaders and the administration had been able to come up with, bucking presidential speeches, pleading visits from Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and urgent warnings that the economy could nosedive without the legislation. In the face of thousands of phone calls and e-mails fiercely opposing the measure, many lawmakers were not willing to take the political risk of voting for it just five weeks before the elections. The bill went down, 228-205. The House Web site was overwhelmed as millions of people sought information about the measure through the day. The legislation the administration promoted would have allowed the government to buy bad mortgages and other sour assets held by troubled banks and other financial institutions. Getting those debts off their books should bolster those companies' balance sheets, making them more inclined to lend and ease one of the biggest choke points in a national credit crisis. If the plan worked, the thinking went, it would help lift a major weight off the national economy, which is already sputtering. Hoping to pick up enough GOP votes for the next try, Republicans floated several ideas. One would double the $100,000 ceiling on federal deposit insurance. Another would end rules that require companies to devalue assets on their books to reflect the price they could get in the market. In the meantime, Paulson said he would work with other regulators "to use all the tools available to protect our financial system and our economy." "Our tool kit is substantial but insufficient," he said, indicating the government intended to continue piecemeal fixes while pressing Congress for broader action. Stocks started plummeting on Wall Street even before today's vote was over, as traders watched the rescue measure going down on television. Meanwhile, lawmakers were watching them back. As a digital screen in the House chamber recorded a cascade of "no" votes against the bailout, Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley of New York shouted news of the falling Dow Jones industrials. "Six hundred points!" he yelled, jabbing his thumb downward. The final stock carnage was 777 points, far surpassing the 684-point drop on the first trading day after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. In percentage terms, the dropoff was still far below that of Oct. 19, 1987, when the Dow shed 22.6 percent in a single session. But it was dramatic enough that it left many shaken, both on Capitol Hill and off. In the House, "no" votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle. More than two-thirds of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats opposed the bill. Several Democrats in close election fights waited until the last moment, then went against the bill as it became clear the vast majority of Republicans were opposing it. Thirteen of the 19 most vulnerable Republicans and Democrats in an Associated Press analysis voted against the bill despite the pleas from President Bush and their party leaders to pass it. In all, 65 Republicans joined 140 Democrats in voting "yes," while 133 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted "no." The overriding question was what to do next. "The legislation may have failed; the crisis is still with us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a news conference after the defeat. "What happened today cannot stand." Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said he and other Republicans were pained to vote for such measure, but he agreed that in light of the potential consequences for the economy and all Americans, "I think that we need to renew our efforts to find a solution that Congress can support." Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said there was scant time to reopen legislation that was the product of hard-fought bipartisan negotiations. "What happened today was not a failure of a bill, it was a failure of will," said Dodd, the Banking Committee chairman. "Our hope is that cooler heads will prevail, people will think about what they did today and recognize that this is not just scare tactics -- it's reality." A brutal round of partisan finger-pointing followed the vote. Republicans blamed Pelosi's scathing speech near the close of the debate -- which assailed Bush's economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets -- for the defeat. It was not much different from her usual tough words against the president and his party. "We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Boehner said. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi's speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan. That amounted to an appalling accusation by Republicans against Republicans, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee: "Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decide to punish the country." More than a repudiation of Democrats, Frank said, Republicans' refusal to vote for the bailout was a rejection of their own president. The two men campaigning to replace Bush watched the situation closely -- from afar -- and demanded action. In Iowa, Republican John McCain said his rival Barack Obama and congressional Democrats "infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to fix the blame; it's time to fix the problem." Obama said, "Democrats, Republicans, step up to the plate, get it done." Lawmakers were under extraordinary pressure from powerful outside groups, which gave notice they considered the legislation a "key vote" -- one they would consider when rating members of Congress. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said opponents of the bailout would pay for their stance. "Make no mistake: When the aftermath of congressional inaction becomes clear, Americans will not tolerate those who stood by and let the calamity happen," said R. Bruce Josten, the Chamber's top lobbyist, in a letter to members. The conservative Club for Growth made a similar threat to supporters of the bailout. "We're all worried about losing our jobs," Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declared in an impassioned speech in support of the bill before the vote. "Most of us say, 'I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it -- not me.'" "We're in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us," he said. If Congress doesn't come around on a bailout, more pressure would fall on the Federal Reserve. The Fed, which has been providing billions in short-term loans to squeezed banks to help them overcome credit stresses, could keep expanding those loans to encourage lending. And, it could keep working with other central banks to inject billions into financial markets overseas. It also has the power to expand emergency lending to other types of companies and even to individuals if they are unable to secure adequate credit.
-- The Associated Press

House Rejects Bailout Package, 228-205; Stocks Plunge

Headlines from the New York Times:
House Rejects Bailout Package, 228-205; Stocks Plunge
Did we think that if it did not pass that it would throw the Stock Market in a twirl? Of course we did that is the nature of the Stock Market. Look on the bright side of this, oil prices are falling in record numbers! Why all of sudden have they dropped so fast is a question to ask yourself? Here is something right off of the New York Times Headlines:
Oil Falls Sharply on Renewed Economic Fears
By JAD MOUAWAD 30 minutes ago
Crude oil futures fell $9.13 to $97.76 a barrel. They have lost more than $20 since last Monday.
I am adding these Headlines from The New York Times because they are very important for us to look at current time.
Dow Falls More Than 500 Points
By MICHAEL M. GRYNBAUM 7 minutes ago
The drop reinforced the fear coursing through Wall Street as investors wondered whether the bailout plan would eventually pass Congress.
Lehman to Sell Neuberger Unit for $2.15 Billion 12:31 PM ET
Ruth Fremson/The New York Times

Senator Barack Obama in Claremont, N.H. He told his supporters not to grow complacent, even as new polls show him in the lead.-->

Citigroup Buys Bank Operations of Wachovia
By ERIC DASH and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN 12:13 PM ET
The sale would further concentrate Americans’ bank deposits in the hands of just three banks: Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup.
Times Topics: Citigroup Wachovia
Post a Comment Read (191)

House Rejects Bailout Package, 228-205; Stocks Plunge
Leaders Fail to Convert Opponents
By CARL HULSE and DAVID M. HERSZENHORN 44 minutes ago
In a moment of historic drama in the Capitol and on Wall Street, the House of Representatives voted on Monday to reject a $700 billion rescue of the financial industry.
Roll Call
Post a Comment Read (659)

I hope everyone reads more on these Headlines from The New York Times.
I have added a link to a video of the vote just click here.
here is another very important video to view. CLICK HERE!
Obama with a video before the vote came about. CLICK HERE!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

See how they measure up!





Barack Obama's Stance on the Economy
John McCain's Stance on the Economy
Health Care
Obama
As President, Barack Obama will guarantee health coverage for every American and will lower the cost of health care for the average American family by up to $2,500.
McCain
John McCain’s health plan would tax health benefits — imposing a $3.6 trillion tax increase on working families, the largest in American history.
Tax Policy
Obama
Barack Obama will ease the burden on hardworking Americans, offering middle-class tax cuts three times the size of McCain’s.
McCain
John McCain’s economic plan gives Big Oil a $4 billion tax break while 101 million households get no relief at all.
Energy Policy
Obama
Barack Obama will ease American’s burden at the pump, giving American families $1,000 in rebates. Barack will also create five million new jobs by investing in clean energy technologies.
McCain
John McCain’s record on energy puts Big Oil first. McCain has repeatedly opposed alternative energy proposals that help both the environment and working Americans’ pocketbooks.
Trade Policy
Obama
Barack Obama will end tax breaks for companies that send American jobs overseas, and reward companies who create good jobs here at home.
McCain
John McCain keeps tax breaks for companies that send American jobs overseas.
Federal Deficit
Obama
Barack Obama will cut both taxes and spending, implementing a responsible budget that lowers the federal deficit by reducing wasteful spending.
McCain
John McCain’s plan of giving tax cuts to the wealthy and to Big Business will add $3.4 trillion to the national debt, bankrupting America.
Barack Obama's Stance on the Economy
John McCain's Stance on the Economy

Why Sarah Palin should not be VP

This election is far too important for America's future to allow this person to be elected.
Here are my concerns:
1. John McCain is 72 years old. I've read that he has a nearly 30 percent of dying before his term ends - perhaps much higher because of his less-than-ideal health - recurrent skin cancer episodes, for example. I would think that when you also factor in the chance he'll suffer a debilitating stroke or the like or even be assassinated, the chances would rise to over 50 percent. Therefore Palin should be evaluated as if she were running for President.
I would like good statistics on this issue.
2. Sarah Palin's actual policy positions are at variance with that of most Americans, particularly American women. She is "pro-life" in the extreme - no exceptions for rape or incest - and has denied rape kits to women in Alaska who have been raped.
I would like solid information on her other policy positions, insofar as we know them.
3. Sarah Palin's "pastor(s) problem(s)". One apparently is a witch doctor from Africa and another says the Jews need to be wiped out.
Again, solid information about these - including links to relevant You Tube videos would be much appreciated.
4. Her lies, repeated over and over again. Truth about the "bridge to nowhere" is, I think, pretty well established now, but I am sure there are many others which I would like to document, including "troupergate".
Please help me with this project - I hope this site can help get the truth about this terrible choice out to the American people before the election.
If you feel so inclined, please contribute to the Obama campaign at barackobama.com
Thank you!

If you could change the system!


If you had the chance to make a difference in the system of Government what would you do to change it?

This is a hard one to do and I expect some crazy idea's but lets see what we can come up with!

Friday Night Debate




FRIDAY NIGHT DEBATE:


I could not wait for the Friday Night Debate and as I waited all day long I watched CNN. I just can not believe the crisis we have gotten ourselves in. The BAILOUT I think is the worst thing that we could do, but yet what choice do we have? I feel the debate only covered the surface of what either one of these guy's could do. It is hard to make a statement when you do not know what the wording and final bill will be.


I feel that John McCain would be the wrong man for the job when you consider just how close to George W. Bush he is and I am not ready for another four years of the same old stuff. We need a change for the better and I know he can not come close to that. One major thing that bothered me in the debate was all of the worldly places he has been on the tax payers expense. I would think if he was on the hill instead of doing all these travels then maybe he could have made a difference. It seems to me that he was not doing the job he was elected to do if he was not their to do it!


Obama has some truth to what he says and he will not deni the way he has voted on issues like McCain kept making excuses for the way he voted on issues. We need someone to stand-up and not lie to the American people or throw fear tactic's at us. Obama did a fine job in the debate the way I seen it. He does have room for improvements and I am looking forward to the next debate.